
Grupa: Użytkownik
Lokalizacja: Bydgoszcz
Posty: 322 #2482489 Od: 2015-3-2
Ilość edycji wpisu: 1 | Conclusions • CP to CP performs worse than LP to LP by approx. 1.6dB • CP to LP has 2dB loss • No observed difference in spectral width between CP and LP • CP is of course useful to overcome spatial loss in some cases • For ultimate performance LP to LP with allowance for spatial offset is best
It is expected that stations interested in working small-dish “tropo sized” stations will continue to use LP, preferably rotatable. For contests and activity days CP has an advantage.
cała prezentacja
TYLKO ZAREJESTROWANI I ZALOGOWANI UŻYTKOWNICY WIDZĄ LINKI » DARMOWA REJESTRACJA
_________________ 73! Andrzej |